so they purchase it, expecting it to be good viewer. Why would anyone spend money on ACDSee is beyond me.īUT. its just a joke, since there are programs like Dark Table that is Lightroom clone (also free) and not to mention light years ahead as photo processing editing software. I pity the person who purchase this to edit photos. Now its something completely different trying to do things no one asked it to, year after year, just adding features on top of barely usable product, and its below average in those functions. nope ACD wont even acknowledge users wishes and its still there, but no one wants it. we asked for this to be removed (there was public outrage about this and there was even today heaps of articles on how to disable catalogue) why would we want that since its VIEWER. Able to read RAWs and convert file formats. In the beginning it was quite capable and insanely quick photo viewer. Out of 40% that have been using it are not anymore, mostly because over the years ACDSee have become tool that most of them dont need and what they need is pushed further and further back to a point of barely doing that thing. Out of 100% of photographer friends that use computer for photography, 40% have used ACDsee at some point, while other 60% are either too young to know about it or use something else. I would know since i have spent 25 years working in Advertising agency and sort of became Brand-Averse and mostly because someone claims something like this and its like my spidersense. I find one thing false in this statement. I wrote an article explaining the current version about nine months ago, and that will give you a good overview of this comprehensive software. The subscription version available later this month. The newest version of ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate, which has an enthusiastic customer base, is already available for preorder to buy outright.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |